WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:06.004
A good commissioner can tell, from the first pages of a staff report, what decision is actually being asked.

2
00:00:06.004 --> 00:00:07.616
Use the same pass every time.

3
00:00:07.616 --> 00:00:14.453
It comes from the way the Institute for Local Government teaches project review, tightened for a California housing agenda.

4
00:00:14.453 --> 00:00:15.825
First, name the action.

5
00:00:15.825 --> 00:00:18.511
Is this ministerial, and therefore not yours?

6
00:00:18.511 --> 00:00:26.328
Is it a conditional use permit, a variance, a map, a design review, or a legislative recommendation to change the plan or the zone?

7
00:00:26.328 --> 00:00:29.312
The findings you must make are different for each.

8
00:00:29.312 --> 00:00:40.530
In Torrance a conditional use permit requires eleven findings, including compatibility with the neighborhood, a suitable site, adequate access and services, and no harmful noise or hazard.

9
00:00:40.530 --> 00:00:46.617
Do not borrow those findings for a variance, and do not borrow variance findings for a plan amendment.

10
00:00:46.617 --> 00:00:48.109
Second, test consistency.

11
00:00:48.109 --> 00:00:52.226
What is the general plan designation, and what does the zoning allow?

12
00:00:52.226 --> 00:00:53.718
If they conflict, say so.

13
00:00:53.718 --> 00:01:02.789
For housing, consistency is judged against objective standards: rules an applicant can measure before filing, with no room for a personal judgment call.

14
00:01:02.789 --> 00:01:05.355
A height limit of thirty feet is objective.

15
00:01:05.355 --> 00:01:09.651
A rule that upper floors must "step back to ease the transition" is not.

16
00:01:09.651 --> 00:01:16.036
A court of appeal said so in California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund versus City of San Mateo.

17
00:01:16.036 --> 00:01:24.092
If a housing project meets the objective rules, the Housing Accountability Act sharply limits your power to deny it or cut its density.

18
00:01:24.092 --> 00:01:26.272
Third, walk the site without romance.

19
00:01:26.272 --> 00:01:36.522
What is next door, and does the use clash with it in a way the code actually regulates: truck noise against bedrooms, a driveway through a sidewalk, grading on a steep slope?

20
00:01:36.522 --> 00:01:42.354
Can people reach it on foot, on a bike, in a car, and with a delivery truck, or do the paths cross?

21
00:01:42.354 --> 00:01:50.660
Is there a listed historic building, a floodplain, a very high fire zone, or a habitat constraint that a specific written standard addresses?

22
00:01:50.660 --> 00:01:54.254
Neighborhood character, standing alone, is not that standard.

23
00:01:54.254 --> 00:01:56.551
Fourth, read the numbers the code uses.

24
00:01:56.551 --> 00:02:02.383
Height, setbacks, lot coverage, floor area, parking, private open space, window area on the street.

25
00:02:02.383 --> 00:02:09.511
Write down each one the project misses, and then ask whether a density-bonus waiver or concession has already excused it.

26
00:02:09.511 --> 00:02:13.282
A missed standard that state law waives is not a denial finding.

27
00:02:13.282 --> 00:02:15.756
Fifth, read the environmental cover sheet.

28
00:02:15.756 --> 00:02:20.704
Exempt, negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or full impact report.

29
00:02:20.704 --> 00:02:25.947
If it is exempt, the fight will be about whether every condition of the exemption is met.

30
00:02:25.947 --> 00:02:32.015
If it is not, you will need the baseline, the thresholds, and the mitigation, which is its own episode.

31
00:02:32.015 --> 00:02:35.772
Then look at the economics only as far as the law allows you to.

32
00:02:35.772 --> 00:02:39.471
A condition that is legal can still make a project unbuildable.

33
00:02:39.471 --> 00:02:44.755
Ask what the condition costs per home and whether a cheaper design meets the same purpose.

34
00:02:44.755 --> 00:02:55.029
Torrance keeps a small share of the property tax and a much larger share of sales tax, so replacing a store with apartments is a fiscal question as well as a housing question.

35
00:02:55.029 --> 00:02:59.608
Ask staff what the site produces in taxes now and what it would produce after.

36
00:02:59.608 --> 00:03:04.951
Close the pass by drafting, in your notes, the sentence you would say if you voted tonight.

37
00:03:04.951 --> 00:03:13.522
If you cannot tie that sentence to a finding and a page of the record, you are not ready, and the right move is a question to staff, not a speech.
