WEBVTT

1
00:00:01.400 --> 00:00:05.403
Imagine a mixed-use proposal near Del Amo Fashion Center in Torrance.

2
00:00:05.403 --> 00:00:12.887
The traffic study predicts that one intersection will move from a familiar letter grade to a worse grade during the evening peak.

3
00:00:12.887 --> 00:00:18.456
A speaker says that result automatically creates a significant transportation impact under CEQA.

4
00:00:18.456 --> 00:00:21.473
Another says traffic delay no longer matters at all.

5
00:00:21.473 --> 00:00:23.620
Both statements miss the distinction.

6
00:00:23.620 --> 00:00:33.366
California changed the CEQA metric for transportation impacts, but cities still manage congestion, circulation, emergency access, and safety through other lawful tools.

7
00:00:33.366 --> 00:00:39.554
This episode is preparation, not legal advice about a CEQA document, threshold, or mitigation measure.

8
00:00:39.554 --> 00:00:47.986
Transportation analysis depends on current CEQA Guidelines, local thresholds, project facts, technical methods, and current state guidance.

9
00:00:47.986 --> 00:00:49.685
The law and guidance change.

10
00:00:49.685 --> 00:00:57.693
Follow the current statute, the lead agency's adopted policy, the administrative record, and advice from the Torrance city attorney.

11
00:00:57.693 --> 00:01:05.640
Level of service, or LOS, describes traffic operating conditions, often through vehicle delay at intersections or roadway segments.

12
00:01:05.640 --> 00:01:11.524
For decades, environmental review often treated added delay as the central transportation impact.

13
00:01:11.524 --> 00:01:21.959
That approach could reward projects far from destinations, where intersections had spare capacity, and penalize infill in connected places where more people already travel.

14
00:01:21.959 --> 00:01:24.567
Senate Bill 743 changed the CEQA framework.

15
00:01:24.567 --> 00:01:32.575
The CEQA Guidelines now provide that vehicle miles traveled, or VMT, is generally the appropriate measure of transportation impacts.

16
00:01:32.575 --> 00:01:36.215
VMT asks how much driving a project is expected to generate.

17
00:01:36.215 --> 00:01:41.918
A trip of two miles and a trip of twenty miles do not have the same effect under this measure.

18
00:01:41.918 --> 00:01:44.466
The shift serves several state objectives.

19
00:01:44.466 --> 00:01:54.233
It links land use with greenhouse-gas reduction, supports infill, and recognizes that housing near jobs, services, and transportation choices can reduce driving.

20
00:01:54.233 --> 00:01:59.450
It also avoids treating automobile delay itself as a significant environmental impact.

21
00:01:59.450 --> 00:02:01.882
Keep four analytical lanes separate.

22
00:02:01.882 --> 00:02:04.516
Lane one is CEQA transportation impact.

23
00:02:04.516 --> 00:02:09.583
That is where VMT screening, significance, and mitigation generally belong.

24
00:02:09.583 --> 00:02:12.352
Lane two is local circulation operations.

25
00:02:12.352 --> 00:02:21.336
The city may still study queues, turning movements, signal timing, curb access, and network performance for planning and engineering.

26
00:02:21.336 --> 00:02:30.996
Lane three is safety, including collision patterns, speed, sight distance, and the needs of people walking, cycling, or using mobility devices.

27
00:02:30.996 --> 00:02:33.833
Lane four is emergency and service access.

28
00:02:33.833 --> 00:02:39.778
A project can screen out from detailed VMT analysis and still need safe driveway design.

29
00:02:39.778 --> 00:02:44.979
A project can have significant VMT even if nearby intersections operate well.

30
00:02:44.979 --> 00:02:53.085
A project can create a queue requiring operational management without creating a CEQA-significant transportation impact.

31
00:02:53.085 --> 00:02:55.585
Use the right lane for each question.

32
00:02:55.585 --> 00:03:03.285
LCI's SB 743 Technical Advisory provides recommendations, not a substitute for a lead agency's supported judgment.

33
00:03:03.285 --> 00:03:12.202
Common screening concepts include small projects, certain local-serving retail, and projects in low-VMT or transit-supportive areas.

34
00:03:12.202 --> 00:03:20.241
Common analytical approaches compare project-generated VMT per resident or employee with a regional or local benchmark.

35
00:03:20.241 --> 00:03:26.118
The exact method and threshold must come from the applicable adopted policy and record.

36
00:03:26.118 --> 00:03:28.009
Land-use context drives VMT.

37
00:03:28.009 --> 00:03:32.738
Distance between homes, jobs, schools, shopping, and services matters.

38
00:03:32.738 --> 00:03:34.629
Street connectivity matters.

39
00:03:34.629 --> 00:03:37.263
Transit quality and reliability matter.

40
00:03:37.263 --> 00:03:39.695
Parking price and supply can matter.

41
00:03:39.695 --> 00:03:44.424
Household income, vehicle access, and job type affect travel behavior.

42
00:03:44.424 --> 00:03:47.058
A model simplifies these relationships.

43
00:03:47.058 --> 00:03:49.625
Its output is evidence, not an oracle.

44
00:03:49.625 --> 00:03:51.719
Ask what VMT is being measured.

45
00:03:51.719 --> 00:03:56.853
Project-generated VMT differs from a project's effect on total regional VMT.

46
00:03:56.853 --> 00:04:01.176
Residential VMT per capita differs from office VMT per employee.

47
00:04:01.176 --> 00:04:08.269
Boundary choices, horizon year, trip purpose, pass-by assumptions, and induced travel can change results.

48
00:04:08.269 --> 00:04:13.268
A good staff report names the metric and explains why it fits the project.

49
00:04:13.268 --> 00:04:17.122
Mitigation should reduce driving, not merely move cars faster.

50
00:04:17.122 --> 00:04:34.219
Possible strategies include a mix of uses, affordable housing in location-efficient areas, transit passes, parking reform, transportation-demand management, bicycle and pedestrian connections, telework programs where realistic, and improvements that make transit more useful.

51
00:04:34.219 --> 00:04:38.011
Every measure needs evidence, enforceability, and monitoring.

52
00:04:38.011 --> 00:04:40.249
Road widening deserves special care.

53
00:04:40.249 --> 00:04:45.409
Added capacity can reduce delay temporarily but can also induce additional driving.

54
00:04:45.409 --> 00:04:49.512
A measure aimed at LOS may conflict with the goal of reducing VMT.

55
00:04:49.512 --> 00:04:52.621
That does not make every roadway project improper.

56
00:04:52.621 --> 00:04:59.832
It means the agency must identify which problem it is solving and evaluate the consequences with the correct method.

57
00:04:59.832 --> 00:05:11.272
On June 30, 2026, the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation published final guidance for the voluntary statewide VMT mitigation program established by Assembly Bill 130.

58
00:05:11.272 --> 00:05:16.991
The program creates an additional potential path for a project with significant VMT impacts.

59
00:05:16.991 --> 00:05:25.570
When operational and applicable, a lead agency may choose to allow a contribution to the Transit-Oriented Development Implementation Fund.

60
00:05:25.570 --> 00:05:33.590
HCD would use pooled contributions for VMT-efficient affordable housing and related infrastructure through the state TOD program.

61
00:05:33.590 --> 00:05:43.724
The state guidance describes how contributions are calculated, defines location-efficient areas, and provides methods for estimating and validating VMT reductions.

62
00:05:43.724 --> 00:05:45.216
The program is optional.

63
00:05:45.216 --> 00:05:50.003
It does not force every project or lead agency to use the statewide approach.

64
00:05:50.003 --> 00:05:54.106
It does not eliminate on-site mitigation or other lawful measures.

65
00:05:54.106 --> 00:06:02.623
The lead agency still decides feasibility for the project and must satisfy CEQA's requirements for enforceable mitigation and monitoring.

66
00:06:02.623 --> 00:06:08.778
The guidance also anticipates implementation work, including HCD administration and LCI rulemaking.

67
00:06:08.778 --> 00:06:16.300
Do not describe publication of guidance as proof that every operational mechanism is immediately available in every case.

68
00:06:16.300 --> 00:06:18.103
Check current program status.

69
00:06:18.103 --> 00:06:24.501
For practical application, build a four-lane transportation memo for the fictional Del Amo project.

70
00:06:24.501 --> 00:06:31.803
In the CEQA lane, identify the VMT metric, screening question, threshold source, result, and proposed mitigation.

71
00:06:31.803 --> 00:06:38.588
In the operations lane, list queue or circulation issues without calling them CEQA significance findings.

72
00:06:38.588 --> 00:06:43.370
In the safety lane, record speed, conflict, and vulnerable-user questions.

73
00:06:43.370 --> 00:06:48.152
In the access lane, record fire, delivery, paratransit, and service needs.

74
00:06:48.152 --> 00:06:50.220
Then add a mitigation hierarchy.

75
00:06:50.220 --> 00:06:54.485
First, avoid excess VMT through site selection and project design.

76
00:06:54.485 --> 00:06:58.556
Second, reduce VMT with on-site or directly connected measures.

77
00:06:58.556 --> 00:07:01.852
Third, evaluate broader or programmatic strategies.

78
00:07:01.852 --> 00:07:08.250
Fourth, if current law and program status allow, evaluate the AB 130 statewide contribution option.

79
00:07:08.250 --> 00:07:16.715
For each measure, list expected reduction, evidence, responsible party, funding, monitoring, and remedy if performance falls short.

80
00:07:16.715 --> 00:07:21.110
Do not promise mathematical precision that the model cannot support.

81
00:07:21.110 --> 00:07:23.953
Use sensitivity tests for major assumptions.

82
00:07:23.953 --> 00:07:28.541
Ask whether mitigation reductions are already embedded in the baseline.

83
00:07:28.541 --> 00:07:32.806
Avoid double counting one transit improvement in several measures.

84
00:07:32.806 --> 00:07:35.003
The commission's language matters.

85
00:07:35.003 --> 00:07:41.982
Say that LOS information may inform operations, capital planning, or conditions under independent authority.

86
00:07:41.982 --> 00:07:46.506
Do not call automobile delay a significant CEQA transportation impact.

87
00:07:46.506 --> 00:07:50.836
Say that VMT analysis addresses the amount and distance of driving.

88
00:07:50.836 --> 00:07:54.713
Do not claim that VMT measures every transportation concern.

89
00:07:54.713 --> 00:07:56.627
Now three recall questions.

90
00:07:56.627 --> 00:07:57.549
Question one.

91
00:07:57.549 --> 00:08:01.023
What is the basic difference between LOS and VMT?

92
00:08:01.023 --> 00:08:01.519
Answer.

93
00:08:01.519 --> 00:08:05.773
LOS commonly measures traffic operating conditions or delay.

94
00:08:05.773 --> 00:08:09.672
VMT measures the amount and distance of vehicle travel.

95
00:08:09.672 --> 00:08:10.593
Question two.

96
00:08:10.593 --> 00:08:14.138
Did SB 743 make circulation and safety irrelevant?

97
00:08:14.138 --> 00:08:14.634
Answer.

98
00:08:14.634 --> 00:08:14.847
No.

99
00:08:14.847 --> 00:08:18.888
It changed the general CEQA transportation-impact metric.

100
00:08:18.888 --> 00:08:26.332
Agencies still address operations, safety, emergency access, and engineering under appropriate authority.

101
00:08:26.332 --> 00:08:27.395
Question three.

102
00:08:27.395 --> 00:08:31.436
Is the AB 130 statewide VMT mitigation program mandatory?

103
00:08:31.436 --> 00:08:31.933
Answer.

104
00:08:31.933 --> 00:08:32.145
No.

105
00:08:32.145 --> 00:08:35.690
LCI describes it as a voluntary additional option.

106
00:08:35.690 --> 00:08:43.205
Lead agencies retain project-specific responsibility for feasibility, enforceability, and CEQA compliance.

107
00:08:43.205 --> 00:08:48.096
Your learner artifact is the four-lane memo and mitigation hierarchy.

108
00:08:48.096 --> 00:08:53.555
Include one sentence that explains the LOS and VMT distinction to the public.

109
00:08:53.555 --> 00:09:01.070
Add citations to the local threshold, LCI's SB 743 materials, and the June 30, 2026 final AB 130 guidance.

110
00:09:01.070 --> 00:09:05.820
Mark current program availability as a fact requiring verification.

111
00:09:05.820 --> 00:09:27.377
This lesson draws from the Governor's Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation public SB 743 transportation-impact materials, the CEQA Guidelines, the SB 743 Technical Advisory, and LCI's June 30, 2026 final AB 130 Statewide VMT Mitigation Program Guidance and frequently asked questions.

112
00:09:27.377 --> 00:09:33.345
It also uses SCAG public Toolbox Tuesday materials on local VMT and travel data.

113
00:09:33.345 --> 00:09:35.284
All narration is original.

114
00:09:35.284 --> 00:09:40.953
No source prose, slide, map, recording, or proprietary data has been copied.

115
00:09:40.953 --> 00:09:49.755
Confirm current guidance, regulations, local thresholds, program status, technical evidence, and city-attorney advice.